Above The Law Hasn’t Had Comments For More Than One Year
Continue reading for the latest information on our commenting policy.
Continue reading for the latest information on our commenting policy.
Check out the update! Lawyers love to kvetch, but rarely consider their complaints may be the basis of a lawsuit.
And how to navigate them in 2026.
* Still wondering why we got rid of the comments? Here's David Lat's in-depth look at the issue. (Spoiler alert: it's because they were terrible.) [Washington Post] * Is this the reason more attorneys aren't seeking help for the addiction issues they face? [Law and More] * Kansas may be hurting after a disastrous series of tax cuts, but that hasn't stopped the politicians there. [Slate] * How Bill Clinton's crime bill shaped twenty years of activism. [Pacific Standard Magazine] * Yes, it has become painfully clear that the New York electoral system is in need of reform. [Lawyers, Guns and Money] * You think you know Harriet Tubman, but really, you have no idea. [Wonkblog] * David Lat chats with Mirriam Seddiq, host of the "Not Guilty No Way" podcast, about legal blogging, perceptions of women lawyers, and his former boss, Chris Christie. [Not Guilty No Way via Soundcloud]
Small-firm columnist Gary J. Ross bids adieu to the Above the Law commentariat.
Columnist Tamara Tabo respectfully dissents from the recent decision to remove reader comments from Above the Law.
Love them or hate them, Above the Law comments are going away.
Its new features transform how you can track and analyze the more than 200,000 bills, regulations, and other measures set to be introduced this year.